Dynamic Resource Management

Contents

Dynamic Resource Management 1

Introduction.. 2

Frequency of DRM Use. 3

Impact on Critical Fire Response. 4

Impact on Critical Special Service Response. 8

Average Engine Availability over daily 24hr period. 9

Financial Impact 10

Impact on Prevention and Protection Activity. 12

Impact Other Resources (mobilisations) 13

Preston Area Impacts. 14

Blackpool Area Impacts. 15

Blackburn Area Impacts. 16

Burnley Area Impacts. 17

 

 


 

Introduction

1.    Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service has robust systems in place to monitor, manage, and dynamically deploy our fire engines and firefighters to respond to emergencies across Lancashire.

 

2.    There are 58 fire engines and a number of specialist appliances in the county however some are often unavailable due to many reasons: ongoing incidents, training, maintenance, leave or sickness absence; unavailability of on-call staff; and other operational reasons.

 

3.    When there is a crewing shortage, we take steps to keep a fire engine or specialist appliance available, by bringing in firefighters from other stations (we call this detaching) or on overtime.

 

4.    With improved technology and access to more comprehensive data, we now have a greater understanding of fire risk across Lancashire. As a result, we have changed this approach to ensure sufficient resources are available in the areas that need them and reduce unnecessary overtime.

 

5.    Firefighters who crew a second fire engine may be detached to maintain the availability of a first fire engine somewhere else, making that fire engine temporarily unavailable. This only occurs when the first fire engine is available as well as other fire engines in the area and this ensures we maintain a balanced level of fire cover across the county.

 

6.    This forms part of a dynamic, risk-based approach to managing resources effectively.

 

7.    Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service continually assesses and adjusts our operational resources to ensure the best possible emergency response across the county.

 

8.    Using technology, we can see at any given time where live incidents are located, which fire engines are attending, which fire engines are available, and which are temporarily offline for training, maintenance, or crewing. This data is combined with five years’ previous incident data to highlight community risk, enabling us to position fire engines in precisely the locations they are needed.

 

9.    Every decision we make is guided by our commitment to public safety. Whether it’s moving a fire engine to cover a neighbouring area or investing in new technology, our goal is always the same: to ensure that every community in Lancashire receives a timely and effective emergency response.

 

10. The Dynamic Resource Management (DRM) policy came into effect on 1 July 2025, it is a policy which provides steps which can be taken prior to using overtime to fill shortfalls, such as redistributing the crew from second fire engines at two pump wholetime stations where there is adequate fire cover in the area.

 

11. The four, two pump wholetime stations within LFRS are; Blackburn, Blackpool, Burnley, and Preston. DRM will only be enacted if the first fire engine at that station and neighbouring station(s) are available, the table below highlights which engines must be available to enact DRM:

DRM Stations

Engines that must be available to enact DRM

Blackburn

Blackburn P1

Darwen P1

 

Blackpool

Blackpool P1

Bispham P1

South Shore P1

Burnley

Burnley P1

Nelson P1

 

Preston

Preston P1

Fulwood P1

Penwortham P1

 

Frequency of DRM Use

Appliance

 DRM

Jul-25

Aug-25

Sep-25

Oct-25

Nov-25

Dec-25

Blackpool

57

11

14

8

4

10

10

Preston

57

6

20

7

9

5

10

Blackburn

52

6

8

7

13

8

10

Burnley

42

3

11

9

11

5

3

Total

208

26

53

31

37

28

33

 

Engine

# DRM

% DRM

Q2

Q3

Blackpool

33

24

15%

Preston

33

24

15%

Blackburn

21

31

14%

Burnley

23

19

11%

Total

110

98

14%

 

*Data from 01/07/25 – 31/12/2025

12. DRM has been used a total of 208 times in Q2 (July – September) and Q3 (October – December). 208 occasions out of a total of 1472 available shifts across the four stations in that timeframe, representing DRM being enacted on 14% of available shifts.


Impact on Critical Fire Response

13. Critical fire incidents are defined as incidents that are likely to involve a significant threat to life, structures or the environment. Our response standards, in respect of critical fires, are variable and are determined by the risk map (KPI 2.1) and subsequent risk grade of the Super Output Area (SOA) in which the fire occurred. The response standards include call handling and fire engine response time for the first fire engine attending a critical fire, and are as follows:

14.When reviewing our critical fire response times and any impacts since DRM has been initiated, there has been no detrimental impact on any incident outcomes.  In the current year, there have been fewer fires in low and medium risk LSOAs and an increase in high and very high risk LSOAs, when compared to the previous year.  Across the four stations where DRM is enacted, response times have improved when compared to the same period last year, in all but the low-risk category, though this remains substantially under the 12-minute average response time target.  Since DRM was introduced at the start of quarter 2 (Q2), overall response times at DRM stations have improved by 8 seconds, whereas response times across all stations over the same period have increased by 9 seconds. Whilst DRM cannot be attributed to the improved response times, it does highlight that DRM has not had detrimental impacts on response times and public safety.

DRM Stations

Risk

Target

(Mins)

2024/25

2025/26

Previous Year to Date

Year to Date

Q1

Incs

Q2

Incs

Q3

Incs

Q1

Incs

Q2

Incs

Q3

Incs

mm:ss

Incs

mm:ss

Incs

L

12

07:41

20

07:57

16

06:33

9

07:07

11

07:58

12

07:10

14

07:33

45

07:25

37

M

10

06:23

51

06:03

44

06:20

61

05:46

45

06:10

46

06:08

39

06:16

156

06:01

130

H

8

06:13

11

05:39

9

05:45

17

05:21

14

06:44

14

05:34

19

05:52

37

05:51

47

VH

6

05:36

6

05:38

7

05:50

9

05:50

11

04:35

5

05:48

9

05:42

22

05:34

25

Overall

06:36

88

06:22

76

06:12

96

05:53

81

06:34

77

06:18

81

06:23

260

06:15

239

Blackburn Station

Risk

Target

(Mins)

2024/25

2025/26

Previous Year to Date

Year to Date

Q1

Incs

Q2

Incs

Q3

Incs

Q1

Incs

Q2

Incs

Q3

Incs

mm:ss

Incs

mm:ss

Incs

L

12

10:21

4

09:29

3

05:31

1

07:12

3

08:43

6

10:08

3

09:25

8

08:41

12

M

10

06:36

16

06:32

13

06:19

24

06:46

12

06:20

21

05:53

18

06:27

53

06:17

51

H

8

05:49

3

05:55

2

06:51

2

03:38

1

05:11

2

05:00

3

06:08

7

04:50

6

VH

6

-

0

-

0

05:11

1

-

0

-

0

-

0

05:11

1

-

0

Overall

07:09

23

06:57

18

06:17

28

06:39

16

07:03

29

06:51

24

06:45

69

06:34

69

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Blackpool Station

Risk

Target

(Mins)

2024/25

2025/26

Previous Year to Date

Year to Date

Q1

Incs

Q2

Incs

Q3

Incs

Q1

Incs

Q2

Incs

Q3

Incs

mm:ss

Incs

mm:ss

Incs

L

12

07:16

8

08:13

7

06:26

4

04:03

1

07:26

4

07:19

2

07:27

19

06:55

7

M

10

05:46

11

07:48

6

05:26

9

05:07

19

05:38

8

04:16

2

06:07

26

05:12

29

H

8

05:20

6

05:38

4

05:07

7

07:07

1

05:30

3

-

0

05:19

17

05:54

4

VH

6

05:26

4

05:31

3

05:51

4

05:19

8

04:35

5

05:27

8

05:37

11

05:11

21

Overall

06:03

29

07:10

20

05:35

24

05:12

29

05:42

20

05:34

12

06:12

73

05:26

61


 

Burnley Station

 

Risk

Target

(Mins)

2024/25

2025/26

Previous Year to Date

Year to Date

 

Q1

Incs

Q2

Incs

Q3

Incs

Q1

Incs

Q2

Incs

Q3

Incs

mm:ss

Incs

mm:ss

Incs

 

L

12

04:56

3

08:30

2

06:56

2

08:58

4

-

0

06:18

6

06:31

7

07:22

10

 

M

10

06:16

15

04:48

15

05:47

10

05:37

5

06:03

10

06:50

9

05:36

40

06:15

24

 

H

8

-

0

05:28

1

05:30

2

05:10

7

06:56

4

05:28

10

05:29

3

05:39

21

 

VH

6

03:09

1

04:00

2

03:54

1

-

0

-

0

-

0

03:46

4

-

0

 

Overall

05:53

19

05:08

20

05:47

15

06:15

16

06:18

14

06:09

25

05:35

54

06:13

55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preston Station

Risk

Target

(Mins)

2024/25

2025/26

Previous Year to Date

Year to Date

Q1

Incs

Q2

Incs

Q3

Incs

Q1

Incs

Q2

Incs

Q3

Incs

mm:ss

Incs

mm:ss

Incs

L

12

07:51

5

06:02

4

06:54

2

05:34

3

06:49

2

05:51

3

07:01

11

05:59

8

M

10

06:57

9

06:16

10

07:08

18

05:52

9

06:26

7

06:22

10

06:51

37

06:13

26

H

8

09:29

2

05:29

2

06:12

6

05:37

5

07:56

5

06:02

6

06:43

10

06:30

16

VH

6

08:40

1

07:25

2

06:41

3

07:14

3

-

0

08:34

1

07:15

6

07:34

4

Overall

07:37

17

06:16

18

06:52

29

05:58

20

07:01

14

06:18

20

06:54

64

06:22

54

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Incidents in Very High Risk (VH) Lower Super Output Areas (LSOA) in the Preston station area have not met the specified response standard in the previous year to date, or the current year to date.  There has only been one critical fire in a VH risk LSOA in Preston area since the introduction of DRM.  DRM was in place when the incident occurred, but a standby appliance from Bamber Bridge was available on station at Preston and responded.  Analysis of the response times shows that travel time and extended call handling times were the main cause behind a delayed response.  The low numbers of incidents, six in 2024/25 and four in 2025/26 mean that a single slower response will have an exaggerated impact on the average figure.  When reporting all stations performance, this impact is reduced and the overall response time is within the prescribed standard (six minutes).

All LFRS Stations

Risk

Target

(Mins)

2024/25

2025/26

Previous Year to Date

Year to Date

Q1

Incs

Q2

Incs

Q3

Incs

Q1

Incs

Q2

Incs

Q3

Incs

mm:ss

Incs

mm:ss

Incs

L

12

08:51

118

09:02

111

08:20

107

09:07

124

09:18

138

08:57

125

08:45

336

09:08

387

M

10

07:00

174

06:54

132

07:35

158

07:05

172

07:05

140

07:22

140

07:10

464

07:10

452

H

8

07:12

22

06:35

24

06:09

29

05:37

30

06:38

29

06:09

32

06:36

75

06:08

91

VH

6

06:02

10

05:55

10

06:03

12

05:49

15

04:57

8

05:31

11

06:00

32

05:31

34

Overall

07:40

324

07:42

277

07:39

306

07:38

341

07:59

315

07:52

308

07:40

907

07:48

964

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Impact on Critical Special Service Response

15.Critical special service incidents are non-fire incidents where there is a risk to life, for example, road traffic collisions, rescues and hazardous materials incidents. For these incidents there is a single response standard which measures call handling time and fire engine response time.

The response standard for the first fire engine attending a critical special service call = 13 minutes
 

 


16. When reviewing our critical special service response times and any impacts since DRM has been initiated, there has been little impact as a direct result of DRM.  In Q1 to Q3 2025, there were 579 critical special service incidents within the four station areas where DRM occurs. Since DRM was introduced at the start of Q2, overall response times at DRM stations have increased by 30 seconds compared with Q1 to Q3 2024, whereas response times across all stations over the same period have increased by eight seconds. Whilst this is a higher increase than overall, our response times remain substantially under the 13-minute average response time target, and our Key Performance Indicator demonstrates that performance levels continue to be met since the introduction of DRM.

Critical Special Service Response

Station

Target

(Mins)

2024/25

2025/26

Previous Year to Date

Year to Date

Q1

Incs

Q2

Incs

Q3

Incs

Q1

Incs

Q2

Incs

Q3

Incs

mm:ss

Incs

mm:ss

Incs

Blackburn

13

08:12

66

07:54

56

08:31

73

09:01

53

09:09

61

08:47

43

07:38

195

09:00

157

Blackpool

06:47

56

06:40

47

06:28

57

07:38

62

06:48

52

07:08

53

08:14

160

07:13

167

Burnley

07:18

48

06:50

44

07:48

53

07:28

35

08:12

42

06:53

36

06:38

145

07:33

113

Preston

07:46

45

08:45

54

08:11

43

07:57

49

09:40

49

08:32

44

07:21

142

08:43

142

DRM Stations

07:32

215

07:37

201

07:46

226

08:03

199

08:29

204

07:50

176

07:38

642

08:08

579

LFRS Overall

08:22

716

08:36

690

08:49

741

08:38

666

08:45

681

08:47

672

08:36

2147

08:44

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Average Engine Availability over daily 24hr period

 

17.         As highlighted at the start of this paper, not every fire engine is always available due to various reasons. Robust performance monitoring is in place through various KPIs, below is a breakdown of average engine availability by month.

 

 

 

2024

2025

Avg. Avail. 

 

 

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Pumps Avail (OC) 

21 

21 

20 

20 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

23 

22 

24 

24 

23 

23 

24 

24 

24

24

24

23 

Pumps Avail (WT) 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

25 

25 

25 

25

26

25

26 

Pumps Avail (All) 

47 

47 

46 

46 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

49 

48 

50 

50 

49 

49 

48 

49 

49

50

49

48 

 

18. Whilst the average number of Wholetime fire engines available has occasionally reduced from 1 July 2025, On-Call fire engine availability has increased and whilst there is typically a drop in availability over the summer periods, there is still a significant upward trend compared to the 2024 summer period. Combined availability has resulted in LFRS maintaining an average of 48 fire engines available at any one time since DRM has been instigated, which is higher than the average availability over the same period last year.

 

 


 

Financial Impact

19.Dynamic Resource Management aims to reduce the usage of overtime and overall budgetary pressures. Once DRM is enacted and a fire engine has been taken off the run, the remaining crew are redistributed to fill shortfalls as required.

 

20.The number of overtime shifts/activities recorded in Q2 & Q3 2025/26 (July – December) was 116.

This is compared with 1479 in Q2 & Q3 2024/25, a reduction of 1363 overtime shifts.

 

 

21.116 Overtime shifts across the six months represent a cost of £47,185.  For the same period in 2024, the overtime expenditure was £596,270, this equates to a saving of £549,085. This figure includes on-costs (such as national insurance, but not employer pension as overtime is non-pensionable) and is for overtime shifts directly related to maintaining fire engine availability.

To enable direct comparison, one pay figure has been used (2025), therefore the 2024 cost will be slightly over reported as a 3.2% pay rise was awarded from July 2025.


 

 

22.Average detachments have been increasing year on year, and the number of detachments has increased over the same period in 2025 compared to 2024. This is to be expected with DRM as staff are detached to cover shortfalls at other stations. When staff go on detachments, overtime or time owing is incurred for travel to and from each detachment. This is capped at a total of 3 hours and can be taken as time or payment; the costs of detachments are significantly less than a full overtime shift. Detached duty payments for 2025 Q2 & Q3 were £22,055.  In 2024 the cost of detachments in Q2 & Q3 was £21,198 (equivalent including 2025 pay rise), representing a 4% increase in Q2 & Q3 2025. Firefighters are increasingly choosing to take time rather than payment, which may ultimately have a detrimental impact on staff availability due to taking this time back.

The actual numbers of detachments in Q2 & Q3 2025 increased by only 0.6% from 713 in 2024, to 717 in 2025. 


 

Impact on Prevention and Protection Activity

23.Enacting DRM and temporarily removing a resource from a two-pump station for a shift is anticipated to reduce the available time to complete prevention and protection activity.

 

Overall, LFRS operational crews carried out 16% less Business Fire Safety Checks (BFSC) in Q2 & Q3 2025/26 compared with Q2 & Q3 2024/25. It is anticipated that enacting DRM will impact the activity at neighbouring stations due to an increase in mobilisations, however stations eligible for DRM and their neighbours have experienced a smaller drop in BFSC numbers of 13%.

 

A reduction in Home Fire Safety Checks (HFSCs) was also seen in Q2 & Q3 2025/26 compared with Q2 & Q3 2024/25 at DRM stations, though this similar to the reduction across all stations.  DRM and neighbouring stations experienced a slightly larger reduction, potentially indicating that the increased activity for neighbouring appliances may be having an impact.

Whilst there has been a small reduction in HFSC and BFSC numbers over the period, we are still above targets for both measures.

 

Business Fire Safety and Home Fire Safety Checks

 

2024/25 – 2025/26 Q2 &Q3 Comparison % Change

 

BFSC

HFSC

Stations

2024/25

2025/26

Diff.

2024/25

2025/26

Diff.

All Ops

1541

1292

-16%

6272

5508

-12%

DRM Stations

650

556

-14%

1820

1526

-16%

DRM & Neighbouring Stations

1139

994

-13%

3561

3002

-16%

Non-DRM Stations

891

736

-17%

4452

3982

-11%

 


 

Impact Other Resources (mobilisations)

24.By removing a fire engine for a full shift, it can be assumed that incident activity (mobilisations) will increase for the remaining, and neighbouring engine.

As can be seen by the trend lines (linear) in the chart below, incidents have been increasing slightly year on year since 2018/19. Mobilisations have also been increasing, but at a greater rate.

 

Incidents and Mobilisations per Year

 

25. Beyond prevention activities, Lancashire FRS has little control over the number of incidents which it faces annually.  However, policy decisions can have an impact on the number of mobilisations. Two examples are the Automatic Fire Alarm (AFA) policy, which has been amended over recent years to remove non-life risk premises, and assisting other agencies through gaining entry requests which LFRS carries out on behalf of Lancashire Police.  Gaining entry accounts for 8% of all incidents at wholetime stations.


 

Preston Area Impacts

26. Comparing Preston Q2 & Q3 over the previous eight years, as expected, Preston L50P2 has received fewer mobilisations than average; whilst Preston L50P1, Penwortham L57P1 and Fulwood L52P1 have all experienced increases in mobilisations, Penwortham L57P1 is the only fire engine out of the expected range of deviation.  Bamber Bridge L53P1 has experienced a reduction in mobilisations, whilst within the expected deviation, it is nonetheless surprising and indicates that Penwortham are picking up the majority of the extra mobilisations.  This may be attributed to Fulwood being On Call at night, rather than incident location.

 

 Fiscal Year

Quarter 

L50P1

L50P2

L57P1

L52P1

L53P1

2018-2019

Q2 & Q3

539

739

543

427

554

2019-2020

Q2 & Q3

540

852

495

453

495

2020-2021

Q2 & Q3

493

830

449

452

457

2021-2022

Q2 & Q3

547

983

559

503

535

2022-2023

Q2 & Q3

589

989

661

557

514

2023-2024

Q2 & Q3

650

961

610

606

575

2024-2025

Q2 & Q3

550

867

612

512

457

2025-2026

Q2 & Q3

600

874

651

531

494

 

 

 

Avg 2018/19-2024/25

558

889

561

501

512

Std Dev 2018/19-2024/25

46

86

68

59

42

Deviation 2025/26

42

-15

90

30

-18

 


Blackpool Area Impacts

27. Comparing Blackpool area Q2 & Q3 mobilisations over the previous eight years, Blackpool L30P2 has experienced reduced mobilisations, but in line with standard deviation.  Most of the mobilisations appear to have been absorbed by Blackpool L30P1, with Bispham L31P1 and South Shore L37P1 also seeing an increase beyond standard deviation.  Fleetwood L32P1 and St. Annes L36P1 have experienced fewer than average mobilisations, L36P1 has changed crewing to FDC during this period which may account for a reduction in activity.  The reduction at both these stations is within expected standard deviation.

 

Fiscal Year

Quarter 

L30P1

L30P2

L31P1

L32P1

L36P1

L37P1

2018-2019

Q2 & Q3

448

724

455

322

311

517

2019-2020

Q2 & Q3

398

769

442

390

297

549

2020-2021

Q2 & Q3

364

744

461

410

319

548

2021-2022

Q2 & Q3

399

812

426

431

321

676

2022-2023

Q2 & Q3

444

819

481

396

372

682

2023-2024

Q2 & Q3

465

802

505

413

330

646

2024-2025

Q2 & Q3

462

759

506

356

312

591

2025-2026

Q2 & Q3

565

753

534

374

318

675

 

 

 

 

 

 

Avg 2018/19-2024/25

426

776

468

388

323

601

Std Dev 2018/19-2024/25

36

34

28

35

22

62

Deviation 2025/26

139

-23

66

-14

-5

74

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Blackburn Area Impacts

28. Comparing Q2 & Q3 mobilisations in Blackburn and neighbouring stations over the previous eight years, despite DRM being enacted in Q2 & Q3 2025/26 Blackburn L71P2 has experienced greater than average mobilisations, but at 16 more than average, this is well within standard deviation.  L71P1 has seen an expected increase in mobilisations, but only five more than expected standard deviation.  All other station mobilisations have fallen within the expected range, with Darwen L76P1 receiving the greatest increase.

 

 

Fiscal Year

Quarter 

L71P1

L71P2

L76P1

L70P1

2018-2019

Q2 & Q3

531

1004

340

749

2019-2020

Q2 & Q3

423

880

325

693

2020-2021

Q2 & Q3

428

868

364

755

2021-2022

Q2 & Q3

463

946

482

768

2022-2023

Q2 & Q3

542

973

466

829

2023-2024

Q2 & Q3

508

915

393

764

2024-2025

Q2 & Q3

469

812

381

876

2025-2026

Q2 & Q3

530

930

438

810

 

 

 

 

Avg 2018/19-2024/25

481

914

393

776

Std Dev 2018/19-2024/25

44

61

56

55

Deviation 2025/26

49

16

45

34

 


 

Burnley Area Impacts

29. Comparing Q2 & Q3 mobilisations in Burnley and neighbouring stations over the previous eight years, Burnley L90P2 has received 100 fewer mobilisations than average, almost double the standard deviation for that fire engine.  Burnley L90P1 was mobilised on 86 occasions over the average, which is 49 more than standard deviation. Nelson L94P1 and Padiham L92P1 mobilisations do not appear to have been affected. It is hard to identify any other stations/appliances which have experienced an increase in mobilisations due to DRM at Burnley, indicating that Burnley L90P1 was able to absorb most of the mobilisations normally attended by L90P2.

Fiscal Year

Quarter 

L90P1

L90P2

L92P1

L94P1

2018-2019

Q2 & Q3

416

710

158

466

2019-2020

Q2 & Q3

377

739

119

434

2020-2021

Q2 & Q3

322

669

162

438

2021-2022

Q2 & Q3

357

732

106

531

2022-2023

Q2 & Q3

439

842

140

569

2023-2024

Q2 & Q3

360

702

117

508

2024-2025

Q2 & Q3

406

679

100

491

2025-2026

Q2 & Q3

468

625

136

495

 

 

 

Avg 2018/19-2024/25

382

725

129

491

Std Dev 2018/19-2024/25

37

53

23

46

Deviation 2025/26

86

-100

7

4